For some reason, my directory is no longer showing the thumbnails against the link or link details. The thumbnails all still exist in the directory, and they are being called in the script using <img src="thumbnail.php?id={LINKID}&thumbwidth=100&thumbheight=100"> but nothing is displaying.
What could have been changed to cause this to happen?
Well if you're actually using 3.15 I can't help you, since it's years old and a gaping security hole, as you know, and did a lot of things different in templates as well. Why bother asking a question about something released on March 19th 2005 which I've sent multiple emails urging people not to use?
0/5
1
2
3
4
5
This thread is closed, so you cannot post a reply.
Comments on Thumbnails not showing
Member
Usergroup: Customer
Joined: May 06, 2005
Total Topics: 5
Total Comments: 15
For some reason, my directory is no longer showing the thumbnails against the link or link details. The thumbnails all still exist in the directory, and they are being called in the script using <img src="thumbnail.php?id={LINKID}&thumbwidth=100&thumbheight=100"> but nothing is displaying.
What could have been changed to cause this to happen?
Forum Regular
Usergroup: Customer
Joined: Aug 09, 2004
Location: Chile
Total Topics: 172
Total Comments: 462
You should be using:
.../thumbnail.php?id={LINKID}&attachid={ATTACHID}&thumbwidth=100&thumbheight=100
For a thumbnail of an added field of file type you should use:
.../thumbnail.php?id={LINKID}&field=mynewfieldnameattach&thumbwidth=100&thumbheight=100
where mynewfieldname is yor new field name
developer
Usergroup: Administrator
Joined: Dec 20, 2001
Location: Diamond Springs, California
Total Topics: 61
Total Comments: 7868
Presumably he's using the native field. The default templates have the proper template code for that but it's also at scripts.webmastersite.net/w...nks/wsnmanual/articles/138
Well if you're actually using 3.15 I can't help you, since it's years old and a gaping security hole, as you know, and did a lot of things different in templates as well. Why bother asking a question about something released on March 19th 2005 which I've sent multiple emails urging people not to use?