| Message Text |
The recent price increase to $74 seems to have actually reduced revenue, but revenue was no longer good enough to be workable long term at the $60 level, so I'm pondering whether a lower price with only 1 install per license would be more effective. Hence the poll. Bulk license prices would be lowered to lessen the impact. The idea is to make more off of the people who have 2 or 3 installs, if there are many of them, not necessarily to make more off of the occasional 50 install buyer (since such buyers are highly appreciated). Also, this would only apply to future license purchases -- it would not change the terms of your existing purchase, it only takes effect when you purchase a new license. Please answer honestly.
'Course there are considerations beyond the poll numbers -- how many of the people who have multiple installs would actually pay for another license, compared to how many just have extra installs as an unimportant way of getting full use from their existing license? Then there's the possibility that people would simply ignore the terms and do multiple installs without paying, figuring
that I'm too busy with the scripts to enforce it. |
